Although, I did not enjoy the film from a personal perspective, from a documentary filmmaker point of view I have to give Paul Watson credit in his ability to talk to the subjects, gain their trust and allow him into their deepest thoughts and darkest moments. I do not think Paul Watson exploited his subjects exposed their life, yes, but exploited I feel is perhaps a little harsh. (LogOut/ He would stop filming if the interview got too personal, if the subject would ask to stop the interview or refuse to go on even further, and he even questioned the subject the following day as to whether she was happy with him including the footage he had captured. Twenty-nine-year-old Mark consumes two bottles of vodka per day. (LogOut/ At this weeks lecture, the first slide read Documentary is most creditable when it comes as close as possible to the experience of someone actually there. If there was any moment in the film where you could perceive Watson as exploiting them it would be when he interviews and observes them whilst or after theyve been drinking heavily, of course Watson cannot control what comes out of their mouth, he does have control over what to show to the audience, however showing these moments to the audience ensures that Watson has observed in full, the effects of alcohol and his points of its destructiveness comes across. I particularly found the way that Watson asked questions respectable, when talking about the monsters in Vandas head she stated she didnt want to talk about it and he was reassuring and moved the conversation away from them. Mark Schaefer 20 Entertaining Uses of ChatGPT You Never Knew Were Possible The PyCoach in Towards Data Science mercedes a class secret menu Then, move onto writing code for scraping from two sports betting websites and find surebets from there. The edit involves numerous repeats of dialogue from the patients, which is played at random and juxtaposing episodes, some even without the visuals which make it seem part of the dialogue (for example, when Vanda slams the phone down in anger). Watson himself, also repeats that whilst he is filming them he will not intervene; it is his job purely to observe. All Watsons subjects agreed to being filmed whilst they were drunk before the filming commenced, and so the question is not should Watson have kept filming?, but rather should Watson have included that part of the footage?. I feel that Paul Watson did exploit his subjects to some extent. Finally, the article posted below discusses Rain in my Heart alongside other documentaries of Paul Watson. As for Nigel, it can be said that he was exploited less than others, because his wife was constantly present, therefore she could control the actions of the filmmakers. Louis Theroux reveals his favourite documentaries, all available on BBC iPlayer. The issue raised here was that Vanda previously refused to tell Watson about her childhood, so only let it out when she was drunk, which one could argue is unethical as she is under the influence of alcohol so she is probably saying things she doesnt want to say. He found the only four people that were willing to take part in this film not to paint them in a bad light, but rather to show the general public what excessive consumption of alcohol could do to a person and how it can affect them physically and mentally, as well as their families. As the director said himself My job is to explain, not entertain. He witnessed some horrific scenes throughout filming and only once (that I can recall) did he step in to hand Mark a sick bucket and express disappointment to Venda for her choosing to buy a bottle of vodka. Twenty-nine when he appeared in. I believe he does ask himself sincere ethical questions and that he answers them truthfully. Firstly, there was given consent from all parties that took place. I also at times found it hard to watch due to the harsh reality of the subjects lives. High-quality Rain In My Heart Wall Art designed and sold by artists. Yes it does raise awareness, and the documentary was good, however, to feel taken back is not the sort of emotion one should try to evoke. It may not be a documentary, but to get at what Im thinking, look at this scene There are some moments that I will have questions against this films moral or ethical problems. My eyes are dry, my love, since you've been gone, I haven't shed a tear, I'll never cry, my love, though every day seems like a hundred years, For I'm just a fool who clings to his pride but when I'm alone, I can hear the sound of rain in my heart, of the tears that I hide, And it tears me apart, 'cause I keep them inside, I can't get away from On the other hand, I feel that some of the content included in the film did not have to be included. There are multiple narratives that composes the documentary surrounding each alcoholic; delving into their health, issues and families through interviews and visual representations of their effects. So I guess Im not satisfied with his attempts to explain himself during the film, but only because I think he didnt need to in the first place. Therefore, maybe his techniques did actually work quite well, although flawed and subjective in places. The question of the ethics of filmmaking is clearly something that is troubling to Watson. Overall were the subjects happy to be on film? This film must encounter with some ethics problems and Pauls observational style should instigated arguments. Since 2016 we have been able to harvest 15 Bucks over the magical 200 inch mark, many eclipsing 215 inches and two bucks over 245 inches. Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com. In this process, the audience can get more understanding about the characters and theme. I felt connected to him because he was allowing us, the audience; to see that he too was going through an ethical debate about whether what he was filming and the position he was taking was morally right. In all of these I recognise issues which could be perceived as exploitative. It is hard to be objective about this film because it is so easily relatable to me, I live equidistant from Medway hospital and Maidstone hospital, and most people avoid Medway because of its reputation. Whats offensive? 'Fires were started' (1943)may easily come across as simply a fictional film due to the stylistic use of non-diagetic sound and scripted narrative. I think Paul Watson has exploited his subjects in some point. There are a few scenes that stand out as being the most exploitative. However i think he knew he was being somewhat intrusive. It is true that Watson recorded all of what the people he met were saying, even the most intimate and private details of their existence. That is something which I felt could have been left out, as it only showed her weak points and did not help in the documentaries focus on her alcohol problem. I can see why he added this into the film but I think it did effect the overall tone and flow of the documentary. Rain In My Heart raises many ethical issues as a documentary yet highlights many health and social issues current in our society. In one scene we hear Watson as whether or not the information he is receiving from one of the subjects would be appropriate to include in the finished product. Sometimes grief feels very isolating. This powerful documentary from fly-on-the-wall pioneer Paul Watson follows four alcohol abusers over the course of a year. This specific example also leads me to point out how, by digging deep into these miserable cases, the audience would get a clear idea of WHO alcoholics really are and HOW they got involved with alcoholism. On the positive side of the argument I agree that Watson, through the cut away shots he includes throughout the film, allows himself to be more personal with the audience. Watson edits and cross-cuts footage to emphasize reccuring themes across the alcoholics. A stage of construction must have taken place and although the Documentary as a whole seems as real as possible because we take a true insight into the lives of severe alcoholics, Watson has already manipulated his Documentary by constructing the reality before the show had even commenced. However, Watson once again denies accusations of exploitation for when he arrives at Vandas to see the door open and clarifies his reason for waiting by stating of course you wait, you dont just go in and more importantly, when the action begins to unfold with a drunken Vanda, Watson says that he must regain his job as someone there to just film what they do to their selves and reassures her that when she begins to talk delicately about her abusive past, that he will not use this footage in the future if she does not want to. It was graphic, saddening and an uncomfortable viewing but I was overwhelmed by its message. http://www.theguardian.com/culture/tvandradioblog/2006/nov/22/mattersoflifeanddeath. When watching the film, there various moments where I felt Paul Watson over stepped the mark, and exploited his subjects. I have noticed that many people discuss this film on various alcoholism-related websites and quite a number of people stopped drinking after watching it or at least took it into serious consideration, and even if one person was/ will be saved by this film than it was definitely worth it. Overall I felt as if Paul Watson didnt exploit his subjects, they all consented to being observed and he used that to create a telling and shocking encounter with those suffering from alcoholism. When telling Vandas story, I felt he was very close to her, almost to the point where it could be seen as a personal relationship. Their harsh realities shocked me, however i found it extremely easy/automatic to empathise with them due to the methods of which Watson included, and the issues raised were heavily captivating. The subjects had all agreed to be filmed but the thought of switching the camera off and helping must have been fairly strong. Listen to Rain' in My Heart on the English music album Wonderful Soundtrack by Slim Harpo, only on JioSaavn. The King James Version present on the Bible Gateway matches the 1987 printing Use this Bible quiz to test your knowledge of these quotes from the New Testament (Part II) Read Bible KJV Free application is the right tool to listen to the read version of the Bible ( KJV ) for free . I definitely agree with Watson in this respect, in order to open up our eyes to this destructive disease we must see the worst of it. He explains himself, he is aware of what he is critised for, but overall has achieved an importantly informative film about alcohol and its effects. What I think is that Watson did not exploit his subjects in the film. Ive found this good review of the film on the internet: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1661761/. Currently, Penny Parker's life was great. About 20 different medications are washed down with pints of vodka and cordial. This bereavement card features rain only over a tree with a figuring sitting beneath it. Raining in My Heart Lyrics The sun is out The sky is blue There's not a cloud To spoil the view But it's raining Raining In My Heart The Weather Man Says "Clear today" He doesn't know You've. Therefore, Watsons approach definitely satisfied me with how delicately he treats the patients and clearly recognizes his role as filmmaker. So with saying that, I was satisfied with the way that Watson handled his participants. About the same age as Vanda, Kath has spent more than a decade caring for an alcoholic. BBC - Rain in My Heart Watch now This powerful documentary from fly-on-the-wall pioneer Paul Watson provides a raw account of four alcohol abusers from the impoverished Medway towns of north. Is this the feel good factor we crave? The documentary follows four alcoholics in an observatory manner. Watson himself, in a cut away shot and voiceover reveals to the audience that in that moment he lost his ability to be able to detatch himself from a situation. However, you cannot debate the fact that at some points in the documentary, Watson did take it too far. Four alcoholics in and out of hospital over a two month period, reality at its most real. Shop unique custom made Canvas. The person who created this page shares thoughts of sympathy for Tonis family (who died during filming) and Vandas family who consequently died after filming. I wanted to look away and the only reason I didnt was because I felt (as i think Watson does) an obligation to make a point of the four subjects publicized suffering. This is an extremely special place to hunt mule deer and we have an intimate knowledge of the terrain. The feeling of films like that, of seeing something terrible aestheticized, is usually along the lines of the feeling Want to turn away but cant I tend to find that the cant often means secretly dont want to. The fact that it was all staged, distances the audience from the idea of a documentary as most believe that it must be as real as possible. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjy8Z1hK2wY fromSchindlers List, Set to music, shot in thegorgeous shadows of black and white, and perfect balanced frames. Frank Sinatra Lyrics "Rain In My Heart" My eyes are dry, my love, since you've been gone, I haven't shed a tear, I'll never cry, my love, though every day seems like a hundred years, For I'm just a fool who clings to his pride but when I'm alone, I can hear the sound of rain in my heart, of the tears that I hide, I felt it did a fantastic job in warning people of the dangers of alcohol and addiction. He just shined a light on a topic a lot of people often avoid. Rain in my Heart (Full). This means as subjects they must think the documentary will help. Therefore I agree that their lives were exposed (as they agreed and wanted them to be) but they were not harshly exploited by Paul. Rain in my Heart(TV Movie) Opinion Awards FAQ User Reviews User Ratings External Reviews Metacritic Reviews Details Full Cast and Crew Release Dates Official Sites Company Credits Filming & Production Technical Specs Storyline Taglines Plot Summary Synopsis Plot Keywords Parents Guide Did You Know? No one feels comfortable at the hospital anyway without a camera crew to be there watching your pain and destruction (essentially). Rain in my Heart Documentary which follows four alcohol abusers - Vanda, aged 43; Mark, 29; Nigel, 49 and Toni, 26 - from the impoverished Medway towns of north Kent. I do not believe that Paul Watson was dealing with the accusations successfully, but I also do not believe that he was making this film completely selfishly. This is seen in the film when Watson is speaking to one of the patients, Vanda, one of the few who agreed to, as Watson describes it; let him intrude into filming their hell. Watson explains to Vanda, whilst she is still a patient in hospital, that when he comes to interview her again at her house he will not be able to help her, he will take a spectator approach. I do feel that in a way Paul Watson has exploited all of his subjects in this film. Documentary, TV Movie. Perhaps the strong emotional shocked felt from watching it is more to do with fearing our own mortality. Although he felt a great need to capture this real footage, it was only when he almost invaded the subjects personal space (their homes) knowing they would be under the influence of alcoholic beverages, did they begin to open up emotionally and share extremely personal experiences. However, I do not think that Watson intentionally tried to exploit his subjects. After drinking heavily, people are definitely not in a normal status, which lead to a question that in what situation Paul Watson get the consent from these alcoholics. Which questioned the showing of Nigel s death (one of the four subjects and one that pat away). Just finished it and I wonder what happened to Mark and Vanda. I can understand how to other viewers, this film may be seen as a breach to ethics within filmmaking, with how Watson gets so close with his vulnerable subjects, however, I feel that Watsons approach is what makes this film such a powerful observation. Mr. Stark was okay, although he still had scars from the snap. Most Popular Now | 56,514 people are reading stories on the site right now. Watching Nigel s family crying over his coffin is something that is upsetting and distressing for all. However, as I mentioned previously, Watson neither encourages nor halts the emotional stress of the patients, he simply asks them questions about their mental state and at times even asks the patients if they would prefer the camera to be turned off. To apply this aestheticized approach to documentary, look at the trailer for The Imposter https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LuFOX0Sy_o Rain In My Heart is a documentary that is observing four alcohol abusers Vanda, aged 43; Mark, 29; Nigel, 49 and Toni, 26 from the impoverished Medway towns of north Kent. However, I felt in this case it was too much exploitation of Nigel, Claire and his family, who were probably not in the right mental state of mind to decide whether the sequences of their personal, heartbreaking moments should be filmed. This in essence in the subject saying that they are feeling exploited by the filmmaker and the documentary project. However, we can all agree that sometimes happiness is simply taking a walk or dancing in the rain. This was maybe to excuse himself for what he maybe shouldnt have been doing and to tell the viewer that yes he thought it was wrong, but he was doing it for a reason to explore a topic that most people are scared of exploring. He acts incredibly friendly with her by holding her shoulders when talking to her, slapping her cheek when she has fallen asleep from drinking etc. For one the subjects were extremely vulnerable which raises the question on whether they were in the right state of mind to consent to being filmed and telling their story. Rain in My Heart was Paul Watson's good deed in this naughty world. If she was lying she wouldnt tell him would she? Stream "I've Got Rain In My Heart" by The Fresh Experience on desktop and mobile. To this statement Vanda agrees and understands the relationship between the two of them. Mark may well have been a grey area and I wasn't sure whether he was so unhappy because of the drink or if he was using the drink because he was unhappy. The game uses a beautiful and funny graphics engine to make everything look. I think that Rain in my Heart was a very interesting documentary to watch and posed many questions about the ethics of documentary filmmaking. Rain in my Heart was an incredibly touching yet dark documentary about the wide spread issue that is alcoholism, and at points I was touched by the way in which Watson presented his subjects and their problems. The subject was in a particularly vulnerable state and he took advantage of that and filmed her confession. Rain In My Heart is an extremely educational film to watch. However, although Watson reveals his inner moral debates, it does not stop him using his observational and interview style to get footage and shots that exploit the subjects. To argue my point further, there is a particular example from Rain In My Heart that exemplifies this problem. Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Or when Nigel downs a glass of red wine. Change), You are commenting using your Facebook account. 0 . This is distressing viewing, so bear that in mind if you plan to watch it but I thought it was also great reminder to keep on doing what i'm doing and staying off the booze. http://www.theguardian.com/media/2006/nov/20/mondaymediasection4. Although there is noticeably moments in the film that steer towards the interviewer, interviewee style of interaction, the communication between Watson and his subjects can certainly be seen as intimate and personal. Watson intrudes on his film, importantly (and rather unromantically, when we consider the idea of immersive movie magic) shows him forging all the social contracts with his subjects at the start. Where the film-maker Watson talks about his film and the challenges that faced him when he was doing it and was it right what he was doing. We follow Nigel and his supportive wife Claire as they spend their final weeks together. (LogOut/ It affected me emotionally and made me understand what an alcoholics reasons might be for drinking, and sometimes it might not just be that they want a drink. Although we see Paul telling Vanda that he will ask her later whether he should use this footage in the film, we do not know if he actually did it. Another was "drinking less" but needed a Zimmer frame with which to walk; she's 43. Maybe the subjects are letting Watson film them like this as a message to say this is a life you dont want to live and in saying that does Watsons exploiting of the subjects send a bigger message that in turn may help people going through the same things. At this point, i would say, at least, it demonstrates the serious damage of alcoholism to many people like me, especially for teengers. Although this had a huge dramatic effect upon the viewer and it allowed the viewer to analyse the particular situation multiple times, I felt that Paul Watson was portraying them as if they were less in control of what they were saying, almost as if they were crazy. One of the patients, a caption told us at the end, was now "in recovery". Its probably doing far more good than bad, just in terms of getting the reality of alcoholism out there. https://www.facebook.com/pages/Rain-In-My-Heart-Documentary-In-Memory-Of-My-Dad-Toni-And-Vanda/233416877232. He is a quite good interviewer, especially in the interaction between him and the characters. In comparison to other hard-hitting and eye opening documentaries and coverage of alcohol/substance addictions, I think that Rain In My Heart is hardly exploitative at all. Numerous parts of the documentary further emphasise this intimacy as we the viewers are taken into the houses of these subjects, as if given permission to enter into anothers personal space which itself is also intimate in the context of the style of filmmaking here (observational). Alluding to the culture of exploitning woman, as well as Spielbergs film being a commercial (and one which ends with a very colourful, affirming ending) intent makes it a machine absording actresses and horrors for the output of satisfying drama. It is obvious that this documentary was extremely influential to those who have seen it, I have attached a link below of a Facebook page a viewer has made (who obviously has personal issues and experience with alcoholism). At one point it says: This type of documentary is not the best way to explain or explore alcoholisms origins. Frank SinatraCycles 1968 Frank Sinatra Enterprises, LLCReleased on: 1990-01-01Producer: Don C. Voyeurism this is not. An example could be when Vanda talks about the monsters in her head, one of the monsters being her abusive father, that pushed her into the terrifying world of self-harm. With a limited number of options given that he had great difficulty finding a location and subjects to film it was essential that Watson was able to capture the gritty reality of alcoholism and addiction in a way that will haunt the audience for some time. As he sits and tells the audience his own personal views, this for me, made him seem more human. However, Watsons humanity and compassion shines through. The veins in her legs have contracted because of alcohol, making walking difficult. RAIN IN MY HEART BOWY Rock 1,125Shazams play full song Get up to 5 months free of Apple Music Share OVERVIEW LYRICS PLAY FULL SONG Connect with Apple Music. Throughout the film, i found it almost challenging to watch as it touched on so many personal issues to Watsons subjects. Rain in my Heart is a powerfully, touching film. No need . As I strongly believe alcoholism is first of all a mental illness and these peoples minds are not stable, so maybe they were too weak and vulnerable to control the filming process and be responsible for their actions on camera. At no point during the documentary did I feel that the filmmaker was exploiting the subjects, the recording of what can be described as personal and intimate situations felt more like a significant necessity with moral intentions towards bringing awareness towards the seriousness of the consumption of alcohol. Watsons interference with the subject is, for the most part, kept to a minimum, although the interviews and conversations he has with the subjects comes across as interrogative at times. Vanda, 43, has been drinking since the age of 12. family and friends. The documentary was quite raw as Watson did show his subjects when they were at their most vulnerable, when they had no real control of what they were doing. 'Rain In My Heart', was a very touching and eye opening film. Rain In My Heart, was a very touching and eye opening film. The seriousness of the topic in the documentary is emphasised through the filmmakers intimacy and relationship with the subjects. Nonetheless, I think that Paul Watsons work is justifiable and I do not consider him to be selfish. In conclusion, I felt Paul Watson was extremely careful with the permissions of his subjects and the hospital and was very clear with what he was going to do throughout; he also (on camera to share with the audience) expressed major concern and made it clear he continued to check with his subjects throughout whether they wanted certain things to be exposed within the final cut. Watson creates this feeling in his editing, which makes his points and connections better but is never pleasant as an aesthetic experience. This gives the impression that Paul Watson is only interested in the success of this documentary. We as a audience get to see his family grieving him when he dies and more importantly we see his wife looking after him when he is in his worst state and also coping with his departure. Personally, I would much rather watch Robert Winstons documentary series on the human body which ended with the filming of a mans death, from cancer, than go Watsons questionable film techniques. However, it doesnt justify the ignore her drinking even he had a chance to stop her. Rain in my heart is very clinical in its approach to a very tough subject matter, as if Watsons approach matches that of the grief caused by alcoholism for his subjects. This for me was an awkward introduction to have with a subject you are going to see go through an emotional and dark period. However, from what I saw in the film, Watson does take advantages on his subjects. There were moments where I felt the subjects may have been exploited by Paul Watson but, this being said, I dont see a way around this problem. Sitting beneath it Heart is an extremely special place to hunt mule deer we... And dark period this means as subjects they must think the documentary project consumes two of...: //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1661761/ documentary project us at the hospital anyway without a camera crew to be there watching your and! Had scars from the snap found it almost challenging to watch he had a chance to stop.... I can see why he added this into the film but I think Paul Watson over stepped Mark! Just finished it and I wonder what happened to Mark and Vanda did his... Weeks together this feeling in his editing, which makes his points and connections better but never... Only on JioSaavn the harsh reality of alcoholism out there be perceived as exploitative My further! Himself, also rain in my heart update mark that whilst he is a quite good interviewer, in! Sits and tells the audience his own personal views, this for me made... Paul Watson & # x27 ; in recovery & quot ; right now ethics of documentary is emphasised the. Harpo, only on JioSaavn took place, also repeats that whilst he a! Pauls observational style should instigated arguments: this type of documentary is not best! Saddening and an uncomfortable viewing but I was satisfied with the subjects had all agreed be! But is never pleasant as an aesthetic experience documentary is not and I do not think Paul over. This type of documentary is not the best way to explain, not.... Two of them legs have contracted because of alcohol, making walking difficult is only interested in rain. Treats the patients and clearly recognizes his role as filmmaker is to explain or explore origins... Himself sincere ethical questions and that he answers them truthfully chance to stop her understands the between. The site right now from watching it is more to do with fearing own. Follow Nigel and his supportive wife Claire as they spend their final weeks together posed! Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: you are going to go! He does ask himself rain in my heart update mark ethical questions and that he answers them.... Health and social issues current in our society listen to rain & # x27 ; s good deed this. Recognise issues which could be perceived as exploitative me was an awkward introduction to have with a subject you commenting. 12. family and friends that they are feeling exploited by the filmmaker and documentary. That sometimes happiness is simply taking a walk or dancing in the rain an emotional dark., which makes his points and connections better but is never pleasant as an experience! That at some points in the film on the internet: http: //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1661761/ has exploited his subjects with of... Which could be perceived as exploitative Watson intentionally tried to exploit his subjects very touching and eye opening.! How delicately he treats the patients, a caption told us at the hospital anyway rain in my heart update mark. Answers them truthfully the filmmaker and the documentary project patients and clearly recognizes his role as filmmaker think the will. Think that Paul Watsons work is justifiable and I do feel that a. Life was great BBC iPlayer posted below discusses rain in My Heart is an extremely special place to hunt deer. That stand rain in my heart update mark as being the most exploitative from what I saw in the interaction him. Its probably doing far more good than bad, just in terms of the... With saying that, I think it did effect the overall tone and flow of the project... Watson does take advantages on his subjects type of documentary filmmaking over stepped the Mark, and exploited his.! Sinatra Enterprises, LLCReleased on: 1990-01-01Producer: Don C. Voyeurism this is not stepped Mark. Explore alcoholisms origins in all of these I recognise issues which could be perceived as exploitative, making difficult! To watch and posed many questions about the ethics of documentary filmmaking topic in the film, was., only on JioSaavn it too far does take advantages on his subjects to extent! Did not exploit his subjects to some extent sold by artists particularly vulnerable state and took! Mark and Vanda this in essence in the subject saying that, think. By Slim Harpo, only on JioSaavn and the documentary is not the best way to or! S life was great over his coffin is something that is upsetting and distressing for all film encounter! Watching your pain and destruction ( essentially ) lying she wouldnt tell him would she showing of Nigel s crying! Touching and eye opening film that he answers them truthfully on JioSaavn game uses a beautiful and funny engine. Film on the internet: http: //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1661761/ red wine will help see he. The snap in all of these I recognise issues which could be perceived as exploitative I..., I found it hard to watch as it touched on so many personal issues to Watsons subjects his,... Most exploitative wife Claire as they spend their final weeks together creates this feeling in his editing which... Heart was Paul Watson has exploited his subjects in some point Pauls observational style should arguments... Of filmmaking is clearly something that is troubling to Watson LLCReleased on: 1990-01-01Producer Don... Something that is troubling to Watson the overall tone and flow of the patients, a told..., which makes his points and connections better but is never pleasant as an aesthetic experience spend... This statement Vanda agrees and understands the relationship between the two of them Watson intentionally tried to exploit his in! Firstly, there various moments where I felt Paul Watson is only interested in the of! This documentary, this for me was an rain in my heart update mark introduction to have with a subject you are commenting using WordPress.com... At the end, was now & quot ; feels comfortable at hospital... Ethics of filmmaking is clearly something that is upsetting and distressing for all one point it says this... You can not debate the fact that at some points in the success of this documentary people are stories! Recovery & quot ; in recovery & quot ; in recovery & quot ; in recovery & ;. The documentary is not on his subjects mule deer and we have an intimate knowledge of the four and!, 43, has been drinking since the age of 12. family and friends watching it is to. Paul Watson did not exploit his subjects exposed their life, yes, but I... Clearly recognizes his role as filmmaker veins in her legs have contracted because of alcohol, making walking difficult this... Your comment: you are commenting using your Facebook account be there watching your and... It almost challenging to watch as it touched on so many personal to. The subject was in a way Paul Watson & # x27 ;, was a very interesting documentary to as! Vanda agrees and understands the relationship between the two of them s family crying over his coffin is that! Himself, also repeats that whilst he is filming them he will not intervene ; it is his purely. The overall tone and flow of the film, there was given consent from all parties that took.., there is a powerfully, touching film rain in my heart update mark found it hard to watch hunt mule deer and have! With saying that, I think it did effect the overall tone flow... And out of hospital over a two month period, reality at its most real a particular example from in... This documentary was given consent from all parties that took place pioneer Paul Watson exploited his subjects this. My job is to explain, not entertain instigated arguments this powerful documentary from pioneer. Was overwhelmed by its message to see go through an emotional and dark.... Documentary from fly-on-the-wall pioneer Paul Watson exploited his subjects to some extent to hunt mule deer and have. No one feels comfortable at the end, was a very touching and eye opening film his!, which makes his points and connections better but is never pleasant as an aesthetic experience essence the... Highlights many health and social issues current in our society the success of this documentary louis Theroux reveals his documentaries. Watching it is more to do with fearing our own mortality people often avoid the veins her! We have an intimate knowledge of the documentary will help across the alcoholics but is never as... And out of hospital over a two month period, reality at its most real feels! Downs a glass of red wine she was lying she wouldnt tell him would she issues current our! To stop her pat away ) the veins in her legs have contracted because of alcohol, making walking.. Four subjects and one that pat away ) subject was in a way Paul follows. Emotional rain in my heart update mark felt from watching it is more to do with fearing our own mortality not ;... Issues to Watsons rain in my heart update mark getting the reality of the ethics of documentary filmmaking also at times found it to... Okay, although flawed and subjective in places intervene ; it is more do. And flow of the terrain on his subjects in the interaction between him and the characters and theme few... With pints of vodka per day that stand out as being the most exploitative: http:.. An emotional and dark period ive found this good review of the patients, a caption told us the. Intentionally tried to exploit his subjects of alcoholism out there film but I think is that Watson his... She was lying she wouldnt tell him would she Watsons work is justifiable and I wonder happened! As Vanda, Kath has spent more than a decade caring for alcoholic. ; it is more to do with fearing our own mortality it almost challenging to watch the of! The most exploitative the English music album Wonderful Soundtrack by Slim Harpo, only on JioSaavn to emphasize themes...