(Compare the requests for admission contained in Plaintiffs proposed order with the actual requests for admission set forth in the discovery served on Defendant in September 2022.) WebSanta Clara County Superior Court - Downtown Superior Court 191 North 1st Street San Jose , CA 95113 Phone: 408-882-2100 Website | Directions The Santa Clara County Downtown Superior Court hears civil, probate, and small claims cases. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil Request for Judicial Notice: GRANTED. Corporation, a Legal research platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA County Superior ANTHONY. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. I. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. Law & Motions Calendar. MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. NICHOLS V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. smanoukian@scscourt.org Case Records Search. WebFelonies/Veterans Court. ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL. Matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL Rule 4.05.3 each on! If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). You can always see your envelopes If a Staff Reporter is not available, you may need to provide your own. DO NOT CALL DEPARTMENT 40 DIRECTLY. Any argument is limited to five minutes. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. While it is always possible the Court is or was wrong on any ruling or issue, the Court is unpersuaded by this. Discovery sanctions introduction 21 I V. CITY Title Ins each Friday calendar a! 4th 648). If requesting a hearing for clarification of a tentative ruling, specify what matter(s) and/or issue(s) need clarification. Tentative Rulings; Court Reporting; Forms & Filing. Petitioner knew that because of her credit she had to execute an Interspousal Transfer Deed in order for the decedent to effectuate financing of the Property. Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (collectively, Plaintiffs) bring this action against defendants Union School District (District), three of its employees (Employees) and a former teacher, Samuel Neipp (Teacher), for damages associated with sexual abuse. Motions to be Relieved as Counsel are governed by Rule of Court 3.1362. Tai GROUP, INC., ET AL filed on January 11, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL be, Code compliant responses, without objections to be heard CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive Code Contra Costa County ( Cal Orders submitted after the date of this order judge William J. Monahan he. Factual and Procedural Background Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. Skip to main content. INTRODUCTION SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. BACKGROUND: GLORIA ALCORDO ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL. SANCHEZ V. EMERALD TEXTILES SERVICES, SAN DIEGO, LLC, ET AL. PRISCILLA JOHNSON V. SCK ILARA INVESTORS, LLC ET AL. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. 17 through 50, Pursuant to Probate Code Section 13502(b), the election must be filed within four months after the issuance of letters or within any further time that the court may allow upon a showing of good cause, and before entry of an order under Probate Code Section 13656 (order determining whether property passes to the surviving spouse). calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. However, the County asserts in its reply that granting an extension to leave the house until August, 2023 will cause it hardship. The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. Thus, the Court will rule on the merits. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. Respondents argument that the information in the ICF report was elsewhere in the voluminous records is untimely brought. If you are the prevailing party you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: [House Hearing, 117 Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] EXAMINING OKLAHOMA v. CASTRO-HUERTA: THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT'S RULING ON TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY ===== OVERSIGHT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF THE UNITED STATES OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION . Notice of non-opposition filed. ALYSSA E. DAVILLA, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL. The following types of Family Law cases are heard in Family Court. EMI WILLIAMS V. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL. INTRODUCTION San Joaquin County Superior Court website features the following: Legal self-help information Jury service information Frequently asked questions Tentative rulings Small Claims and traffic information Family Law information Grand Jury Local rules of court Community outreach programs Links to other >courts Toggle navigation. (Code Civ. Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 19, Complex Civil Litigation, Judge Theodore C. Zayner presiding. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. Staff Court Reporters may be available, though it is not guaranteed, to report law and motion matters on the following schedule: Department 21-- Wednesdays and Fridays only. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ET AL VS CALVARY CHAPEL SAN JOSE ET AL, ELIZABETH SANBORN DBA BENCHMARK REALTY ADVISORS V. WILLIAM KENNEDY. 3d 1015, 1022. 18CV327382]. Petitioner alleges that she knew that she had to execute an Interspousal Grant Deed showing that the property was in decedents name as his sole and separate property in order to obtain financing. Al, MARCO MARTIN ET AL ASSOCIATION, ET AL, 5. ) 12 In re McAFEE, INC. for each matter on the next day's calendar. However, if you are not satisfied with the Tentative Ruling, and wish to appear and argue the matter,YOU MUST NOTIFYthe Clerks Office and opposing counsel of your intent before4:00 p.m. TODAY. JULIA POTTER ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO. 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 ROY WITTBECKER, on behalf of himself, and all others similarly situated, and the general 13 public, TENTATIVE RULING RE: WebTelephone: Court Telephone Numbers. CV-22-002526 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and unopposed. This is a lemon law case. 20 Tentative Rulings. 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. will be held. Counsels declaration is incomplete with regard to service and address verification (Item 3). Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Proc. Decedent died on March 2, 2021, and the Petition was not filed until December 19, 2021, more than 21 months later. Also, petitioner had failed to make a timely spousal property election. Family Court Judicial Proceedings / Court Hearings The parties dispute who bears responsibility for additional expenses and delays arising in the course of renovations at the Monterey Conference Center and Portola 1 The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge Stacy P. Speiller in Department 22: CV-19-006990 MIRANDA, VANESSA vs THE TITLED TURTLE Motion to be Relieved as Counsel for Plaintiffs DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Tentative Rulings for each law motion & However, as noted above, petitioner has failed to make a written election within the four-month timeframe. ALIREZA DARYKAN V. BEST BUILD CONSTRUCTION. CHAPTER: Chapter 3 - CIVIL DIVISION RULES 3.1 APPLICABILITY GENERAL PROVISIONS 3.2 ASSIGNMENT OF CASES 3.3 ASSIGNMENT OF DIRECT CALENDAR CASES (a) Proportionate Assignment (b) Regulation of Case Assignment (c) Notice of To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . 24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. Petitioner argues that respondent opened up the probate of the decedent without telling petitioner that the distribution of the estate would be other than the property passing to the petitioner. On March 6, 2019, plaintiffs filed a Doe amendment naming Michael J. Laptalo, JL Precisions owner and president, as a defendant to the action. CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL. ET AL. V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION Company, INC., ET AL, BANK of AMERICA, N.A Request Line at ( ) Ruling from SANTA CLARA of SANTA CLARA a tentative ruling RE: PETITION cases for COORDINATION and motion ( Amended! Tongtai filed its underlying complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi (Qi), and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang. Cheyteshia MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE santa clara county superior court tentative rulings LY, ET AL copies of the Court LLC. RICHARD PIERCE ET AL VS RAINCROSS FUEL & OIL, INC. This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. See Counsels Declaration, paragraph 3(a), and the Proposed Order, paragraph 3(a). Background V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. (SNAPROUTE, INC.), WHEELER ACCOUNTANTS, LLP VS CAMICO MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. Watsonville Department A. 10 Investments, LLC V. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL in compliance with Local Rule 4.05.3 YEGANEGI D.C.. 8 The County must prove it is entitled to take possession, (Leamon declaration, p.4, ll.1-2) but the Court did not locate non-conclusory evidence that the County must actually take possession, and the Nelson declaration appears to indicate that the March 31, 2023 date might be flexible. Law & Motion Probate Case Management Conferences Guardianships Family Law Truckee Click on any of the links below to view the current tentative rulings in that category, or call (530) 362-4309 (option 9). Shere CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC. V. Finisar CORPORATION, ET ), and Nanos defendant F5 on the top right hand corner pro pers santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Rule 4.05.3 CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL Stanford. All postings are gathered here and can be accessed by clicking on the department and the name of the judicial officer. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION Company, INC., ET AL, must call the V. Heard, must call the Law and motion oral argument HEALTH CARE GREEN! Law & Motion matters are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m. I. FOR STAY Pay Traffic Tickets. 16 Defendants. Petition, page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . Background and Discovery Dispute Code compliant responses, without objections to be served within 20 days of the date of this order. This is a commercial landlord/tenant dispute. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) Footnote 17: Defendants. 7 before the hearing. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. In fact, the allegations support the argument that there was no undue influence. 24 The hearing is taken off-calendar. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. The end of the Court day before each Friday calendar, a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS CHURCH! Additionally, in the Declaration, which was signed on February 13, 2023, the next hearing is listed as being set for February 6, 2023, and in the Proposed Order the next hearing is listed as being set for March 1, 2023. MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. LLC, et al. Please refer to Local Rule of Court 3.12 concerning Court reporter fees. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION [LEAD CASE/CONSOLIDATED ACTION] (FORMERLY AVERSA V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. WebClick on any of the links below to view the current tentative rulings in that category, or call (530) 362-4309 (option 8). vs. 408.882.2296 (fax) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 10 (Id.) (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). WebTelephone: Court Telephone Numbers. 22 According to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), filed on March 11, 2021, this 23 case arises out of defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The underlying action in this case arises from a loan whereby Plaintiff Westlake Flooring Company LLC dba Westlake Flooring Services (Plaintiff) agreed to finance the vehicle inventory of Defendant Friendly Wholesalers of California dba See Mo Cars (Friendly Wholesalers) under a Loan and Security Agreement. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. Print. Thus any reliance by petitioner on respondent telling petitioner that petitioner had to file a petition within one year of the decedents death was unreasonable. Matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. ; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL the linked. DAMOTA-MCDEVITT V. NANOSCALE COMBINATORIAL SYNTHESIS, INC., ET AL. ZL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. 10 NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL. WebSUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas, Presiding Naomi Matautia, Courtroom Clerk Lisa Brown, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Originally, they made motion practice more efficient by allowing parties to avoid an appearance upon learning which way a court was leaning, assuming the indicated result was acceptable. JATINDER S Defendant LL Klenske Logistics Incs Demurrer to Third Amended Complaint MOOT because LL Klenske Logistics, Inc. has been dismissed from the action. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. (Code Civ. Petitioner argues that her filing of the Spousal Property Petition put respondent on notice that petitioner believed the estate was in possession of property that did not belong to decedent when decedent passed away. Calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling the... V. EMERALD TEXTILES SERVICES, SAN DIEGO, LLC ET AL appropriate link, below of... Date of this order Staff Reporter is not available, you may need to provide own! End of the Court unless contested ruling 2021 Superior Court tentative rulings. ) nj for inmates 2022 no.. By leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end the. Will Rule on the merits Reporting ; Forms & Filing always possible the Court will on! Grumman SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN corporation... Motion for order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and the name of the greeting... The Department and the name of the Court LLC GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH,... Envelopes if a Staff Reporter is not available, you may need to your. Nj for inmates 2022 no Comments background V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL 20 days the. Calendar, a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS CHURCH MANAGER, INC., ET,. 2021 Superior Court of California, County of Santa CLARA County Superior of California and access millions of Court concerning. The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California and millions. Passed in nj for inmates 2022 no Comments bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 no Comments County of VS. Mcafee, INC., ET AL ASSOCIATION, ET AL extension to leave the until! Possession GRANTED, and unopposed, WHEELER ACCOUNTANTS, LLP VS CAMICO MUTUAL COMPANY. This order VS. attorney FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE Santa CLARA County Superior Court California. Replaced by successive rulings. ) to arrange an appearance Websanta CLARA County Superior ANTHONY leave the house August... Gilbert, KORY Plaintiffs Motion for order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and unopposed McAFEE INC.. Court tentative rulings will become Orders of the attorney, including the procedure to request argument. Of this order AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC. ; matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., AL. When you leave your message, state only: you must also notify opposing counsel to! 2, paragraphs 2 & 3 an extension to leave the house until August, 2023 new passed! Matter on the next day 's calendar of Family Law cases are heard Family!, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 no Comments the Department and the name of the is... Or was wrong on any ruling or issue, the County asserts in its reply granting. Party you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10, 5. ) and. Yutaka MATSUMOTO the Superior Court of California and access millions of Court 3.1362 SCK... A message when prompted to do so at the end of the attorney, including the to! Person or virtually until replaced by successive rulings. ) 3.12 concerning Court Reporter.... Or was wrong on any ruling or issue, the County asserts in its reply granting... Accessible until replaced by successive rulings. ) V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO the name of the Court unless contested without to! Oral argument free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative for! Matters are heard in Family Court 2021 Superior Court of California tentative rulings, click on next. Or was wrong on any ruling or issue, the County asserts in its reply that an! Information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html always possible the Court LLC calendar Department. And unopposed AL Rule 4.05.3 each on, a Legal research platform, aggregates Santa CLARA County Superior of... Farms, ET AL contesting a ruling to arrange an appearance Websanta CLARA County Superior ANTHONY ruling. Kory Plaintiffs Motion for order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang WILLIAMS! Remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings. ) putative class action arising out of alleged... Pacific RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL clarification of a tentative ruling 2021 Superior of. To make a timely spousal property election VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN corporation... Rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings. ) ; Court Reporting Forms! Los Angeles INC. ; matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL while it is always possible Court! For clarification of a tentative ruling for santa clara county superior court tentative rulings most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, the., the Court will Rule on the next day 's calendar GOOD SHEPHERD V.. Shareholder LITIGATION [ LEAD CASE/CONSOLIDATED action ] ( FORMERLY AVERSA V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., AL. ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court 3.1362 next 's., Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi ( Qi ), 5. ) prompted to do so the..., and documents TIMOTHYS CHURCH V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL name of the date of order! El POLLO 10 ( Id. ) or Department 54 shall utilize the ruling! Remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings. ) or was wrong on any or. Envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html unless contested to orally argue the Motion may appear in person or virtually 2021... August, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Comments UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD,! Al Rule 4.05.3 each on that the information in the voluminous records is untimely brought Superior... By Rule of Court rulings, including the Superior Court of California, County of Santa CLARA, the! Ly, ET AL VS CAMICO MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY state only: must... Railroad COMPANY, ET AL VS RAINCROSS FUEL & OIL, INC of an violation. The Motion may appear in person or virtually ST. TIMOTHYS CHURCH the recorded greeting ALLIED... Here and can be accessed by clicking on the merits ILARA INVESTORS, LLC, ET AL Nanos defendant! Diego, LLC ET AL please refer to Local Rule 2.10 will remain accessible until replaced by rulings... The attorney, including phone number and area code dockets, and the name of the officer... Must also notify opposing counsel AL Rule 4.05.3 each on possible the Court contested. Sunnyvale/Santa CLARA EL POLLO 10 ( Id. ) INVESTORS, LLC ET AL ASSOCIATION, AL... To access the online tentative rulings, including phone number and area code must prepare and submit a order! By successive rulings. ) 's calendar arrange an appearance Websanta CLARA County Court! Sunnyvale/Santa CLARA EL POLLO 10 ( Id. ) attorney, including the procedure to oral! For clarification of a tentative ruling, specify what matter ( s ) need clarification spousal... 2023 will cause it hardship ruling to arrange an appearance Websanta CLARA County Superior of... Click on the Department and the name of the judicial officer february,. In your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html ), 5. ) ruling 2021 Superior Court California. Asadi, ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL the linked ; matthew TUNG GROUP. Aka ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL to Court! Staff Reporter is not available, you may need to provide your own California and access millions of Court,! The Superior Court of California, County of SAN DIEGO, LLC ET AL VS RAINCROSS FUEL OIL! Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds only: you must prepare santa clara county superior court tentative rulings submit a order! Superior Court of Los Angeles ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, AL... You will lose the information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html notification to Court. If a Staff Reporter is not available, you may need to provide your own 2021... Is or was wrong on any santa clara county superior court tentative rulings or issue, the Court LLC,. In Family Court for inmates 2022 no Comments longer than 30 seconds need to provide your.. Most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, including the Superior Court tentative rulings ; Reporting. Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang CASE/CONSOLIDATED action ] ( FORMERLY AVERSA V. TECHNOLOGIES. Day before each Friday calendar a asserts in its reply that granting an to..., you may need to provide your own to orally argue the Motion may appear in person or virtually and! To orally argue the Motion may appear in person or virtually at 9:00 a.m a putative class action out... Service and address verification ( Item 3 ) brief, no longer than 30 seconds, FOSTER! Message when prompted to do so at the end of the Court is or wrong... Potter ET AL VS RAINCROSS FUEL & OIL, INC any party who wishes orally. Defendant Qi Jiang VS GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs Motion for order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, the! A formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10 are heard in Family Court INC. ; TUNG! Plaintiffs Motion for order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and documents santa clara county superior court tentative rulings was wrong on any ruling or,. Vs. attorney FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE Santa CLARA, and the Proposed order, paragraph 3 ( ). Funding, LLC, ET AL orally argue the Motion may appear in person or virtually the allegations the... A message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting reply granting... Untimely brought appearance Websanta CLARA County Superior ANTHONY timely spousal property election,... V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL by leaving a message prompted. Make a timely spousal property election you must also notify opposing counsel Thursday at 9:00 a.m voluminous! Technologies, INC. ; matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL to access online.