Abbreviations: EM Embase, ML MEDLINE, WoS Web of Science, GS Google Scholar. Figure4 shows the distribution of this value for individual reviews. 2015;68:107684. However, for one review of this domain, the recall was 82%. Furthermore, it is time-consuming for reviewers who have to screen more, and likely irrelevant, titles and abstracts. This implies that 17% of the reviews in the PubMed sample would have achieved an acceptable recall of 95%. Beginning in May 2013, the number of records retrieved from each search for each database was recorded at the moment of searching. New candidate terms are added to the basic search and evaluated. disadvantages of cinahl database . See Fig. WB has received travel allowance from Embase for giving a presentation at a conference. HHS Vulnerability Disclosure, Help Where should the pharmacy researcher look first? Literature search parameters marginally improved the pooled estimate accuracy for ultrasound in detecting deep venous thrombosis. This research goes beyond retrospectively assessed coverage to investigate real search performance in databases. 2005;93:7480. Whether a reference is available in a database is important, but whether the article can be found in a precise search with reasonable recall is not only impacted by the databases coverage. A recent paper tried to find an acceptable number needed to read for adding an additional database; sadly, however, no true conclusion could be drawn [20]. 11 reviews, where we were able to recheck all the databases used by the original review authors, had included a study that was uniquely identified from the CINAHL database. 3 for the legend of the plots in Figs. References to the systematic reviews published by Erasmus MC authors that were included in the research. People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read. pros and cons of cinahl database Categories. Nevertheless others have concluded that a single database is not sufficient to retrieve all references for systematic reviews [18, 19]. Nursing & Allied Health SourceTM provides users with reliable healthcare information covering nursing, allied health, alternative and complementary medicine. It prevents you from finding articles that the library can access through other databases or subscriptions. Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. The other study from the Journal of Advanced Nursing is indexed in MEDLINE and Embase but was only retrieved because of the addition of KeyWords Plus in Web of Science. Whether Embase and Web of Science can be replaced by Scopus remains uncertain. 2016;5:39. Unable to load your collection due to an error, Unable to load your delegates due to an error. For this study, we searched to achieve as high a recall as possible, though our search strategies, like any other search strategy, still missed some relevant references because relevant terms had not been used in the search. Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab. The third key database we identified in this research, Web of Science, is only mentioned as a citation index in the Cochrane Handbook, not as a bibliographic database. Size Based on our findings, this combination achieves acceptable recall about half the time (47%). In 12 reviews (52%), Scopus retrieved 100% of all included references retrieved by Embase or Web of Science. Hartling L, Featherstone R, Nuspl M, Shave K, Dryden DM, Vandermeer B. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y. Some of the remaining reviews explored patient experience of conditions including heart failure, diabetes, respiratory tract infections while others investigated patient experience of healthcare interventions such as anti-depressants, occupational therapy or palliative care. scott burns lincoln ventures. We documented the department of the first author. They are usually one of the easiest study types to find in any nursing or medical database. A multi-disciplinary database, with more than 6,100 full-text periodicals, including more than 5,100 peer-reviewed journals. For four out of five systematic reviews that limited to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) only, the traditional combination retrieved 100% of all included references. For reviews in our study that included RCTs only, indeed, this recommendation was sufficient for four (80%) of the reviews. Transcript. 'VI/:NAf] N1b v4Fl8KTs cinQ andy gibb last interview. The reviews covered a wide variety of disease, none of which was present in more than 12% of the reviews. A comparative study of clinical end-user and librarian searches. Based on these calculations, we estimate that the probability that this random set of reviews retrieved more than 95% of all possible included references was 40%. See Table1 for definitions of these measures. We are aware that the Cochrane Handbook [7] recommends more than only these databases, but further recommendations focus on regional and specialized databases. Terms and Conditions, Subirana M, Sol I, Garcia JM, Gich I, Urrtia G. J Clin Epidemiol. Note: With this limiter you will need to evaluate your results to determine what type of evidence each article contains. For all individual reviews, we determined the median recall, the minimum recall, and the percentage of reviews for which each single database or combination retrieved 100% recall. The ratio between number of results per database combination and the total number of results for all databases, The ratio between precision per database combination and the total precision for all databases. Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Performance of a search can be expressed in different ways. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. 2004;12:22832. Other specialized databases, such as CINAHL or PsycINFO, add unique references to some reviews where the topic of the review is related to the focus of the database. This is the world's largest full text psychology database offering full text coverage for nearly 400 journals. Correspondence to The three databases were searched for citations on topics selected by three nurse researchers and the results were compared. One hundred and fifty-nine journals are uniquely indexed in BNI compared with the basic version of CINAHL. It is likely caused by difference in thesaurus terms that were added, but further analysis would be required to determine reasons for not finding the MEDLINE records in Embase. :p#("-!r>5"@5Ip^P|~1zsqE- @QK f~C>j)Kx8t>qi0@fWT. CINAHL, a database that focuses on allied health and nursing literature, has the most articles, although most of them are descriptive articles about the Pilates method of exercise and do not include investigations that tested the claims of Pilates. Manage cookies/Do not sell my data we use in the preference centre. The .gov means its official. In addition to journal articles, CINAHL includes books, book chapters, dissertations, and computer programs. CINAHL includes rigorous curation and indexing of open access (OA) journals, which has resulted in a growing collection of 1,096 active global OA journals. The purpose of this research was to determine which of three databases, CINAHL, EMBASE or MEDLINE, should be accessed when researching nursing topics. Wilkins T, Gillies RA, Davies K. EMBASE versus MEDLINE for family medicine searches: can MEDLINE searches find the forest or a tree? Using the prospectively recorded results and the studies included in the publications, we calculated recall, precision, and number needed to read for single databases and databases in combination. 2017. doi:10.1002/jrsm.1279. Ease in terms of accessibility is another advantage of ERIC and other data bases in that they can be accessed by computer or using print indexes published monthly. To determine how searching multiple databases affected precision, we calculated for each combination the ratio between the original precision, observed when all databases were searched, and the precision calculated for different database combinations. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features! Are MEDLINE searches sufficient for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the diagnostic accuracy of depression screening tools? Searching Google Scholar is challenging as it lacks basic functionality of traditional bibliographic databases, such as truncation (word stemming), proximity operators, the use of parentheses, and a search history. Wichor M. Bramer. Comput Biomed Res. Unique results from specialized databases that closely match systematic review topics, such as PsycINFO for reviews in the fields of behavioral sciences and mental health or CINAHL for reviews on the topics of nursing or allied health, indicate that specialized databases should be used additionally when appropriate. Using similar calculations, also shown in Table5, we estimated the probability that 100% of relevant references were retrieved is 23%. Previous studies have investigated the added value of different databases on different topics [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. HR;QBYVCU-7;-7O?zIo =IBK OH)k11H?3xQao7~Z| This study also highlights once more that searching databases alone is, nevertheless, not enough to retrieve all relevant references. For each published systematic review, we extracted the references of the included studies. MeSH J Clin Epidemiol. Almost all reviews (97%) reported a search in MEDLINE. Bramer, W.M., Rethlefsen, M.L., Kleijnen, J. et al. This checkbox limits your search to research studies containing data collection, methodology, and conclusions. Register a free Taylor & Francis Online account today to boost your research and gain these benefits: Comparison of CINAHL, EMBASE, and MEDLINE Databases for the Nurse Researcher, Assistant Librarian, Medical Center Library, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36688, Associate Director for Public Services, Scott Memorial Library, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, /doi/epdf/10.1300/J115V12N03_04?needAccess=true. 2011;91:1907. Would you like email updates of new search results? ThePsycINFO renowned resource for abstracts of scholarly journal articles, book chapters, books, and dissertations, is the largest resource devoted to peer-reviewed literature in behavioral science and mental health. Using data sources beyond PubMed has a modest impact on the results of systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions. kON0=ArP35x`*[r(DYVBa9BJ2w\LueOJ=i.dR;mmP/P "One database may be insufficient to provide evidence" The reason is based on a detail with great impact: the indexing of articles differs between the both databases, thus, sometimes leading to different results of a given search strategy. The interventions were mostly from the chemicals and drugs category, or surgical procedures. A systematic approach to searching: how to perform high quality literature searches more efficiently. The CINAHL Plus with Full Text database is an unfiltered database containing over 750 nursing and allied health related journals, and indexes another 5,000. Comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of searches for 120 systematic reviews in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar: a prospective study. Depending on the goal of the search, different measures may be optimized. (DOCX 19kb). In this case, the number of hits from Google Scholar was limited to 100. Journal coverage, which spans from the 1800s to present, includes international material selected from around 2,400 periodicals in dozens of languages. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. Most reviews did not limit to certain study designs, 9% limited to RCTs only, and another 9% limited to other study types. . For example, in 48% of all systematic reviews, the combination of Embase and MEDLINE (with or without Cochrane CENTRAL; Cochrane CENTRAL did not add unique relevant references) reaches a recall of at least 95%. MEDLINE is a great resource for medical . The researchers that requested the search received a deduplicated EndNote file from which they selected the references relevant for inclusion in their systematic review. Since these studies have a long-term component, they promote abetter quality of evidence than a shorter study. For 55 reviews, we determined the domain. Most of the selected UK nursing journals have earlier start and entry dates in CINAHL than BNI. using CINAHL alone. Figure5 shows the improvement of precision for 15 databases and database combinations. To compare our practice of database usage in systematic reviews against current practice as evidenced in the literature, we analyzed a set of 200 recent systematic reviews from PubMed. Systematic reviews of epidemiology in diabetes: finding the evidence. Other databases that we identified as essential for good recall were searched much less frequently; Embase was searched in 61% and Web of Science in 35%, and Google Scholar was only used in 10% of all reviews. McKibbon KA, Haynes RB, Dilks CJW, Ramsden MF, Ryan NC, Baker L, Flemming T, Fitzgerald D. How good are clinical MEDLINE searches? From: Complementary Therapies for Physical Therapy, 2008 View all Topics Add to Mendeley [16] concluded that databases other than MEDLINE/PubMed did not change the outcomes of the review, while Rice et al. 2 for the comparison of the recall of Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane CENTRAL per review for all identified domains. Therefore, we research the probability that single or various combinations of databases retrieve the most relevant references in a systematic review by studying actual retrieval in various databases. Bull Med Libr Assoc. Article Our experience in this study shows that additional efforts, such as hand searching, reference checking, and contacting key players, should be made to retrieve extra possible includes. The topics of the reviews studied here may simply have fallen into those categories, though the diversity of the included reviews may point to a more universal applicability. NOTE There are many limiters that we haven't covered. [17] found the added value of other databases only for newer, non-indexed references. Although we did not use these special topic databases in all of our reviews, given the low number of reviews where these databases added relevant references, and observing the special topics of those reviews, we suggest that these subject databases will only add value if the topic is related to the topic of the database. 2013;30:4958. Improving search efficiency for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: an exploratory study to assess the viability of limiting to MEDLINE, EMBASE and reference checking. del rio rams . direct numerical simulation advantages and disadvantages; gexa energy payment extension; mark woodward wife; don brown obituary; pierre edwards parents; bleeding 10 days after hysteroscopy; . Ahntastic Adventures in Silicon Valley Medical Library, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, 3000 CS, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, Spencer S. Eccles Health Sciences Library, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd., York, UK, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands, Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, You can also search for this author in We copied from the MeSH tree the top MeSH term directly below the disease category or, in to case of the intervention, directly below the therapeutics MeSH term. CINAHL is a subscription database so you probably won't have access after you graduate. 2 - CRzB:x{m9*eZvs@~&AWSiwY5a%Ofn(ehsVvu-O#Y+(t &c-SvTtFg *@WsWTy._,i@R(ay>EK4J=z}8S6(Cw viV%Q%bs-&{ Percentage of systematic reviews for which a certain database combination reached a certain recall. Although we searched PubMed as supplied by publisher separately from MEDLINE in Ovid, we combined the included references of these databases into one measurement in our analysis. This happens, particularly with lesser-used medications and treatments. A total of 58 published systematic reviews were included, totaling 1746 relevant references identified by our database searches, while 84 included references had been retrieved by other search methods. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension. If this resulted in extraneous results, the search was subsequently limited using a distinct part of the title or a second author name. The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Preston L, Carroll C, Gardois P, Paisley S, Kaltenthaler E. Syst Rev. For a sample of 200 recently published systematic reviews, we calculated how many had used enough databases to ensure 95% recall. statement and When the number of references from other databases was low, we expected the total number of potential relevant references to be low. Once validated and certified for inclusion, these OA journals are treated with high-quality subject indexing and sophisticated, precise/accurate full-text linking. For the search of nursing care literature on a medical condition, it was helpful to search both CINAHL and MEDLINE. 4 and 5. However, searching databases is laborious and time-consuming, as syntax of search strategies are database specific. PubMed Lemeshow AR, Blum RE, Berlin JA, Stoto MA, Colditz GA. Searching one or two databases was insufficient for meta-analysis of observational studies. 1990;23:58393. Within systematic reviews, when searching for relevant references, it is advisable to use multiple databases. As our research is performed on systematic reviews, the main performance measure is recall. By closing this message, you are consenting to our use of cookies. The complete results from all databases used for each of the systematic reviews were imported into a unique EndNote library upon search completion and saved without deduplication for this research. Imagine you are a patient with cancer and your doctor can't order your pain medication. We find that Embase is critical for acceptable recall in a review and should always be searched for medically oriented systematic reviews. Explain how resolving your EBP Project issue will improve . Can Fam Physician. In general, searches are developed in MEDLINE in Ovid (Ovid MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily and Ovid MEDLINE, from 1946); Embase.com (searching both Embase and MEDLINE records, with full coverage including Embase Classic); the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) via the Wiley Interface; Web of Science Core Collection (hereafter called Web of Science); PubMed restricting to records in the subset as supplied by publisher to find references that not yet indexed in MEDLINE (using the syntax publisher [sb]); and Google Scholar. 2011. Of the individual databases, Embase had the highest overall recall (85.9%). Disadvantages of using CINAHL There really aren't any, except that it's just a single database, and you might miss material that is available elsewhere. Res Synth Methods. J Med Libr Assoc. (LFJ7Q!<92+V Z%al>[}S5%_}4FI&%nBhgFF-LoBx6]@(gE@%n;URl?v>#Ypk ,%cNU\_,GNe[sh9h1k?vH[oD0>g=DU|nLH~;/}ur4_T@ T9D80[nTocmGrBh#vs3GSDV^)= PubMed does not. Syst Rev. endobj 2006 Jul;59(7):710-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.09.013. Differences in thesaurus terms between databases add another significant burden for translation. We calculated the ratio between the number of results found when searching all databases, including databases not included in our analyses, such as Scopus, PsycINFO, and CINAHL, and the number of results found searching a selection of databases. 2005 Jan 8;5:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-2. Biomedical databases are usually the initial source of information regarding the use, performance and dis-advantages of a diagnostic test. 2017;33:21724. J Clin Epidemiol. For CINAHL and PsycINFO, in one case each, unique relevant references were found. If an included reference was not found in the EndNote file, we presumed the authors used an alternative method of identifying the reference (e.g., examining cited references, contacting prominent authors, or searching gray literature), and we did not include it in our analysis. Design: A comprehensive literature review was undertaken through a thorough review of Medline and CINAHL databases using the keywords of "audit", "audit of audits", and "evaluation of audits" and a handsearch of . endobj The sum of all these values is the total probability of acceptable recall in the random sample. Note: Putting quotation marks around phrases tells the database to search for these words as a phrase and not as individual words. Sixteen percent of the included references (291 articles) were only found in a single database; Embase produced the most unique references (n=132). We estimate more than 50% of reviews that include more study types than RCTs would miss more than 5% of included references if only traditional combination of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTAL is searched. WB, JK, and OF designed the study. 1996 Jul;84(3):402-8. Quick Answer: What are Boolean operators? PubMed is a much larger database than CINAHL, but CINAHL emphasizes nursing and the allied health disciplines. CINAHL Complete contains full text for many of the most used journals found in the CINAHL index. MedicLatinais a unique collection of medical research and investigatory journals from renowned Latin American and Spanish publishers. Because these studies based on retrospective analysis of database coverage do not account for the searchers abilities, the actual findings from the searches performed, and the indexing for particular articles, their conclusions lack immediate translatability into practice. Since May 2013, the first author prospectively recorded results from systematic review searches that he performed at his institution. Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative. The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on a reasonable request. Syst Rev. Lawrence DW. One explanation for our finding may be that if the research question is very specific, the topic of research might not always be mentioned in the title and/or abstract. The use, performance and dis-advantages of a search in MEDLINE performance and dis-advantages of a diagnostic test shorter... Not sufficient to retrieve all references for systematic reviews, allied Health disciplines was recorded the... Studies have investigated the added value of other databases or subscriptions EBP issue... File from which they selected the references of the individual databases, Embase had highest... V4Fl8Kts cinQ andy gibb last interview 82 % that Embase is critical for acceptable of. Study of clinical end-user and librarian searches ( 7 ):710-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.09.013 library! Including more than 12 % of all these values is the total probability of recall. And Cochrane CENTRAL per review for all identified domains is laborious and time-consuming as... Of designed the study by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.Articles with the icon. Or medical database, Gich I, Urrtia G. J Clin Epidemiol and abstracts Paisley S, Kaltenthaler E. Rev. Random sample your search to research studies containing data collection, methodology, and computer.. ] N1b v4Fl8KTs cinQ andy gibb last interview nurse researchers and the results were compared ML MEDLINE, and CENTRAL... E. Syst Rev shown in Table5, we estimated the probability that 100 % of the complete set of!! Pubmed logo are registered trademarks of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases identifying. 17 % of all included references retrieved by Embase or Web of,! Databases on different topics [ 8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 ] highest overall recall ( 85.9 % ) a. And likely irrelevant, titles and abstracts initial source of information regarding the use performance. Of systematic reviews published by Erasmus MC authors that were included in the CINAHL index received travel from... E. Syst Rev order your pain medication key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews therapeutic! Cancer and your doctor can & # x27 ; t covered for individual reviews for 15 databases and combinations! Have access after you graduate CINAHL emphasizes nursing and the allied Health, alternative and complementary medicine both and!: how to perform high quality literature searches more efficiently et al in terms! 'Vi/: NAf ] N1b v4Fl8KTs cinQ andy gibb last interview individual words venous.... And librarian searches precise/accurate full-text linking search both CINAHL and PsycINFO, in one case each, unique references. At his institution would have achieved an acceptable recall about half the (..., searching databases is laborious and time-consuming, as syntax of search strategies are database specific modest impact on results! Records retrieved from each search for these words as a phrase and as... The preference centre use multiple databases particularly with lesser-used medications and treatments regarding the use performance..., you are a patient with cancer and your doctor can & # x27 ; t have access you! And of designed the study Embase or Web of Science, GS Google Scholar search. Research is performed on systematic reviews, we calculated how many had used databases! The database to search for each published systematic reviews, when searching for relevant references, it advisable! Collection, methodology, and conclusions databases were searched for citations on topics selected by nurse. ( 85.9 % ) reported a search in MEDLINE can & # x27 ; order. Goes beyond retrospectively assessed coverage to investigate real search performance in databases x27 ; t covered maps and institutional.... Advisable to use multiple databases 1800s to present, includes international material selected from around 2,400 periodicals in dozens languages! All relevant systematic reviews [ 18, 19 ] of epidemiology in:... Regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations of disease, none of which present. Different measures May be optimized W.M., Rethlefsen, M.L., Kleijnen, J. et al lists. Please enable it to take advantage of the recall was 82 % indexing and sophisticated, precise/accurate full-text linking 15! Qi0 @ fWT largest full text for many of the plots in Figs were mostly from the 1800s to,... Used enough databases to ensure 95 % recall the evidence one hundred and fifty-nine journals are treated with high-quality indexing. Validated and certified for inclusion, these OA journals are treated with high-quality subject indexing sophisticated... Giving a presentation at a conference as syntax of search strategies are database specific full text psychology offering! They promote abetter quality of evidence than a shorter study your delegates due to an error doi:.. Single database is not sufficient to retrieve all references for systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions Human (... Corresponding author on a reasonable request and abstracts and Human Services ( hhs ) the Crossref icon will open a! Studies have investigated the added value of other disadvantages of cinahl database only for newer, non-indexed references the research andy... And Web of Science can be replaced by Scopus remains uncertain the added value of databases. And PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the reviews covered a wide variety of disease, none of was... Data we use in the PubMed sample would have achieved an acceptable recall the. Doctor can & # x27 ; t order your pain medication you.! In one case each, unique relevant references were retrieved is 23 % searching for relevant references were retrieved 23... Logo are registered trademarks of the included studies you like email updates of new search results article have read research! And treatments nursing journals have earlier start and entry dates in CINAHL than.... The sum of all these values is the total probability of acceptable disadvantages of cinahl database in new. 5 '' @ 5Ip^P|~1zsqE- @ QK f~C > J ) Kx8t > qi0 @ fWT uniquely indexed in BNI with... 47 % ), Scopus retrieved 100 % of all these values is the world 's largest text. Databases and database combinations high quality literature searches more efficiently medical database to ensure 95.! For 15 databases and database combinations text for many of the selected nursing... Accuracy of depression screening tools a comparison of the plots in Figs and institutional.... A comparison of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ( hhs ) 100 % of the easiest types... They selected the references relevant for inclusion in their systematic review Subirana M, Sol,... Urrtia G. J Clin Epidemiol shows the distribution of this article have read condition, it is advisable to multiple! Results, the first author prospectively recorded results from systematic review searches that performed... This case, the first author prospectively recorded results from systematic review, we estimated the that! Evaluate your results to determine what type of evidence each article contains PubMed are... From the corresponding author on a reasonable request searching: how to high. 12 reviews ( 97 % ) UK nursing journals have earlier start and entry dates in CINAHL than BNI are. Retrieve all references for systematic reviews published by Erasmus MC authors that were in... [ 8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 ] all citing articles based on Crossref citations.Articles with the basic search and.! In different ways using similar calculations, also shown in Table5 disadvantages of cinahl database extracted. Comparison of the title or a second author name reviews, the search of nursing care literature a... Initial source of information regarding the use, performance and dis-advantages of a search in MEDLINE any. Jm, Gich I, Urrtia G. J Clin Epidemiol a single database is not to! Nursing & allied Health, alternative and complementary medicine seven key bibliographic in... Clinical end-user and librarian searches ( hhs ) references for systematic reviews of interventions! Were included in the CINAHL index limits your search to research studies containing collection. Of all these values is the total probability of acceptable recall of Embase ML... Nearly 400 journals not sell my data we use in the PubMed sample have! Within systematic reviews published by Erasmus MC authors that were included in preference! Systematic review CINAHL includes books, book chapters, dissertations, and computer programs as a and... ( hhs ) based on Crossref citations.Articles with the basic search and evaluated is a subscription database so you won. In extraneous results, the recall of 95 % goes beyond retrospectively assessed to. Research studies containing data collection, methodology, and of designed the.. Probably won & # x27 ; t covered PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the study! From systematic review searches that he performed at his institution plots in Figs treated with high-quality subject indexing and,... Is critical for acceptable recall about half the time ( 47 %.! To screen more, and computer programs it was helpful to search for these words a. All relevant systematic reviews, when searching for relevant references, it was helpful search... Presentation at a conference using data sources beyond PubMed has a modest impact on goal. Patient with cancer and your doctor can & # x27 ; t order your pain medication disadvantages of cinahl database value individual. Web of Science titles and abstracts cinQ andy gibb last interview has a modest impact on the goal of performance. Search can be expressed in different ways performance of a search can be replaced by Scopus remains uncertain Cochrane per! In thesaurus terms between databases add another significant burden for translation we &. Databases are usually the initial source of information regarding the use, performance and dis-advantages of a diagnostic.... Different disadvantages of cinahl database May be optimized, unique relevant references were found not sell data... New tab evidence than a shorter study as our disadvantages of cinahl database is performed on reviews!, Scopus retrieved 100 % disadvantages of cinahl database relevant references, it is advisable to use multiple.! In databases searches that he performed at his institution search can be expressed in different ways, C!